The Transformative Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Healthcare: Applications, Challenges, and Ethical Implications
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Medical Robotics, Ethical Considerations, Healthcare Innovation, Patient OutcomesAbstract
Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics into healthcare has the potential to transform various medical applications, enhancing operational efficiency, precision, and patient outcomes. However, ethical considerations surrounding these technologies remain a critical concern.
Methods: This paper conducts a comprehensive literature review, examining the current applications of AI and robotics in healthcare, including diagnostics, treatment, rehabilitation, and patient care. Key methodologies analyzed include machine learning algorithms, natural language processing, and robotic-assisted surgical techniques. The review synthesizes findings from recent studies and evaluates the efficacy and challenges associated with these technologies.
Results: The analysis reveals significant advancements in AI-driven diagnostic tools, particularly in medical imaging, where algorithms enhance accuracy and reduce human error. Robotics has also shown promise in surgical procedures, rehabilitation, and elder care, improving patient engagement and operational workflows. Despite these advancements, challenges such as data privacy, algorithm transparency, and the need for healthcare professionals’ training in AI technologies persist.
Conclusion: The future of medical robotics and AI appears promising, with the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery. However, addressing ethical, operational, and educational challenges is crucial for successful integration. Ongoing collaboration among technologists, healthcare providers, and policymakers will be essential to navigate these complexities and enhance patient care.
References
1. Mercioni MA, Stavarache LL. Disease diagnosis with medical imaging using deep learning. InFuture of Information and Communication Conference 2022 Mar 3 (pp. 198-208). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
2. Lee D, Yoon SN. Application of artificial intelligence-based technologies in the healthcare industry: Opportunities and challenges. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021 Jan;18(1):271.
3. Haoyu L, Jianxing L, Arunkumar N, Hussein AF, Jaber MM. An iomt cloud-based real time sleep apnea detection scheme by using the spo 2 estimation supported by heart rate variability. Future Generat Comput Syst 2019;98:69–77.
4. Orsini M, Pacchioni M, Malagoli A, Guaraldi G. My smart age with hiv: an innovative mobile and iomt framework for patient’s empowerment. In: 2017 IEEE 3rd International forum on research and technologies for society and industry RTSI. IEEE; 2017. p. 1–6.
5. Polu SK, Polu SK. Iomt based smart health care monitoring system. Int J 2019;5: 58–64.
6. Cecil J, Gupta A, Pirela-Cruz M, Ramanathan P. An iomt based cyber training framework for orthopedic surgery using next generation internet technologies. Inform Med Unlocked 2018;12:128–37.
7. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Canc J Clin 2019;69(1): 7–34.
8. Khan S, Islam N, Jan Z, Din IU, Rodrigues JJC. A novel deep learning based framework for the detection and classification of breast cancer using transfer learning. Pattern Recogn Lett 2019;125:1–6.
9. Hu Z, Tang J, Wang Z, Zhang K, Zhang L, Sun Q. Deep learning for image-based cancer detection and diagnosis- a survey. Pattern Recogn 2018;83:134–49.
10. Levine AB, Schlosser C, Grewal J, Coope R, Jones SJ, Yip S. Rise of the machines: advances in deep learning for cancer diagnosis. Trends Canc 2019;5(3):157–69.
11. Jyoti R, Szurley M. The Business Value of IBM AI-Powered Automation Solutions. InIDC. 2021.
12. Habuza T, Navaz AN, Hashim F, Alnajjar F, Zaki N, Serhani MA, Statsenko Y. AI applications in robotics, diagnostic image analysis and precision medicine: Current limitations, future trends, guidelines on CAD systems for medicine. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. 2021 Jan 1;24:100596.
13. Hu W-H, Tang D-H, Teng J, Said S, Rohrmann R, et al. Structural health monitoring of a prestressed concrete bridge based on statistical pattern recognition of continuous dynamic measurements over 14 years. Sensors 2018;18 (12):4117.
14. Xiao J, Jiang C, Wang B. A review on dynamic recycling of electric vehicle battery: Disassembly and echelon utilization. Batteries. 2023 Jan 12;9(1):57.
15. Shah R, Chircu A. IoT and AI in Healthcare: a systematic literature review. Issues Inform Syst 2018;19(3):33–41.
16. Vitanza A, D’Onofrio G, Ricciardi F, Sancarlo D, Greco A, Giuliani F. Assistive robots for the elderly: innovative tools to gather health relevant data. In: Data science for healthcare. Springer; 2019. p. 195–215.
17. Vandemeulebroucke T, de Casterle BD, Gastmans C. The use of care robots in aged care: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2018;74:15–25.
18. Papadopoulos I, Koulouglioti C, Ali S. Views of nurses and other health and social care workers on the use of assistive humanoid and animal-like robots in health and social care: a scoping review. Contemp Nurse 2018;54(4–5):425–42.
19. Nerella SG, Singh P, Sanam T, Digwal CS. PET molecular imaging in drug development: the imaging and chemistry perspective. Frontiers in Medicine. 2022 Feb 28;9:812270.
20. Chen H, Engkvist O, Wang Y, Olivecrona M, Blaschke T. The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 2018;23(6):1241–50.
21. Agrawal P. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. J Pharmacovigilance 2018;6:1–2.
22. Kormushev P, Calinon S, Caldwell DG. Reinforcement learning in robotics: applications and real-world challenges. Robotics 2013;2(3):122–48.
23. Deutsch I, Erel H, Paz M, Hoffman G, Zuckerman O. Home robotic devices for older adults: opportunities and concerns. Comput Hum Behav 2019;98:122–33.
24. Bonaccorsi M, Fiorini L, Cavallo F, Saffiotti A, Dario P. A cloud robotics solution to improve social assistive robots for active and healthy aging. Int J Soc Robot 2016;8(3):393–408.
25. Bhaskar S, Bradley S, Sakhamuri S, Moguilner S, Chattu VK, Pandya S, Schroeder S, Ray D, Banach M. Designing futuristic telemedicine using artificial intelligence and robotics in the COVID-19 era. Front Public Health 2020;8 (November):1–7.
26. Khan S, Tsung A. Aso author reflections: the evolution of minimally invasive liver surgery and the future with robotics. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25(3):786–7.
27. Knab LM, Zenati MS, Khodakov A, Rice M, Al-Abbas A, Bartlett DL, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME. Evolution of a novel robotic training curriculum in a complex general surgical oncology fellowship. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25(12):3445–52.
28. Forsmark A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, Bjartell A, Bjo¨rholt I, Carlsson S, Hugosson J, Marlow T, Stinesen-Kollberg K, Stranne J, et al. Health economic analysis of open and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for prostate cancer within the prospective multicentre lappro trial. Eur Urol 2018;74(6):816–24.
29. Dandapani HG, Tieu K. The contemporary role of robotics in surgery: a predictive mathematical model on the short-term effectiveness of robotic and laparoscopic surgery. Laparosc Endosc Rob Surg 2019;2(1):1–7.
30. Oehler MK. Robotics versus conventional laparoscopy for endometrial cancer: where are we now? Maturitas 2015;81(2):241–2.
31. M¨aenp¨aa¨ M, Nieminen K, Toma´s E, Luukkaala T, M¨aenp¨a¨a JU. Implementing robotic surgery to gynecologic oncology: the first 300 operations performed at a tertiary hospital. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015;94(5):482–8.
32. Jain S, Gautam G. Robotics in urologic oncology. J Minimal Access Surg 2015;11 (1):40.
33. Leung A, Abitbol J, Ramana-Kumar AV, Fadlallah B, Kessous R, Cohen S, Lau S, Salvador S, Gotlieb WH. Outside the operating room: how a robotics program changed resource utilization on the inpatient ward. Gynecol Oncol 2017;145(1): 102–7.
34. Ind TE, Marshall C, Kasius J, Butler J, Barton D, Nobbenhuis M. Introducing robotic radical hysterectomy for stage 1bi cervical cancer—a prospective evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in a single UK institution. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 2019;15(1):1–9.
35. Grimminger PP, van der Horst S, Ruurda JP, van Det M, Morel P, van Hillegersberg R. Surgical robotics for esophageal cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2018; 1434(1):21–6.
36. Mushtaq HH, Shah SK, Agarwal AK. The current role of robotics in colorectal surgery. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2019;21(3):1–9.
37. Teoh B, Waters P, Peacock O, Smart P, Reid K, Rajkumar A, Heriot A, Warrier S. Utilising tatme and robotics to reduce r1 risk in locally advanced rectal cancer with rectovaginal and cervical involvement. Tech Coloproctol 2019;23(4):387–90.
38. Kearney KT, Presenza D, Sacca F, Wright P. Key challenges for developing a Socially Assistive Robotic SAR solution for the health sector. In: IEEE International workshop on computer aided modeling and design of communication links and networks, CAMAD 2018-Septe; 2018. p. 1–7.
39. Wilson G, Pereyda C, Raghunath N, de la Cruz G, Goel S, Nesaei S, Minor B, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Taylor ME, Cook DJ. Robot-enabled support of daily activities in smart home environments. Cognit Syst Res 2019;54:258–72.
40. Weng YH, Hirata Y. Ethically aligned design for assistive robotics. In: 2018 International conference on Intelligence and safety for robotics, ISR 2018; 2018.p. 286–90.
41. Forrester LW, Roy A, Hafer-Macko C, Krebs HI, Macko RF. Task-specific ankle robotics gait training after stroke: a randomized pilot study. J NeuroEng Rehabil 2016;13(1):51.
42. Clipper B, Batcheller J, Thomaz AL, Rozga A. Artificial intelligence and robotics: a nurse leader’s primer. Nurse Leader 2018;16(6):379–84.
43. Parsley BS. Robotics in orthopedics: a brave new world. J Arthroplasty 2018;33 (8):2355–7.
44. Moglia A, Georgiou K, Georgiou E, Satava RM, Cuschieri A. A systematic review on artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery. International Journal of Surgery. 2021 Nov 1;95:106151.
45. Antico M, Sasazawa F, Wu L, Jaiprakash A, Roberts J, Crawford R, Pandey AK, Fontanarosa D. Ultrasound guidance in minimally invasive robotic procedures. Med Image Anal 2019;54:149–67.
46. Hata N, Moreira P, Fischer G. Robotics in mri-guided interventions. Top Magn Reson Imag 2018;27(1):19–23.
47. Wang Y, Wang S. A new directional-intent recognition method for walking training using an omnidirectional robot. J Intell Rob Syst: Theory Appl 2017;87 (2):231–46.
48. Schaeffer FA. BioRobotics: surveillance and the automation of biological life. Catalyst: Fem Theor Technosci 2018;4(1):1–12.
49. Low KH, Mohammed S, Hu T, Seipel J, Vaidyanathan R, Solis J. Biorobotics with hybrid and multimodal locomotion [TC spotlight]. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 2015; 22(3):29–181.
50. Bae MS, Moon WK, Chang JM, Koo HR, Kim WH, Cho N, Yi A, La Yun B, Lee SH, Kim MY, et al. Breast cancer detected with screening us: reasons for nondetection at mammography. Radiology 2014;270(2):369–77.
51. Fenton JJ, Abraham L, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Carney PA, D’orsi C, Elmore JG, Barlow WE, Consortium BCS. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103(15):1152–61.
52. Ciatto S, Del Turco MR, Risso G, Catarzi S, Bonardi R, Viterbo V, Gnutti P, Guglielmoni B, Pinelli L, Pandiscia A, et al. Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection CAD on a national proficiency test of screening mammography. Eur J Radiol 2003;45(2):135–8.
53. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, Agbaje OF, Wallis MG, James J, Boggis CR, Duffy SW. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2008;359(16):1675–84.
54. Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med 2015; 372(9):793–5.
55. Wang Z-G, Zhang L, Zhao W-J. Definition and application of precision medicine. Chin J Traumatol 2016;19(5):249.
56. Nezhad MZ, Zhu D, Sadati N, Yang K, Levi P. Subic: a supervised bi-clustering approach for precision medicine. In: 2017 16th IEEE International conference on machine learning and applications ICMLA. IEEE; 2017. p. 755–60.
57. Lee J-G, Jun S, Cho Y-W, Lee H, Kim GB, Seo JB, Kim N. Deep learning in medical imaging: general overview. Korean J Radiol 2017;18(4):570–84.
58. Miotto R, Li L, Kidd BA, Dudley JT. Deep patient: an unsupervised representation to predict the future of patients from the electronic health records. Sci Rep 2016; 6:26094.
59. Rost B, Radivojac P, Bromberg Y. Protein function in precision medicine: deep understanding with machine learning. FEBS Lett 2016;590(15):2327–41.
60. Mesko B. The role of artificial intelligence in precision medicine. 2017.
61. Krittanawong C, Zhang H, Wang Z, Aydar M, Kitai T. Artificial intelligence in precision cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69(21):2657–64.
62. Syeda-Mahmood T, Walach E, Beymer D, Gilboa-Solomon F, Moradi M, Kisilev P, Kakrania D, Compas C, Wang H, Negahdar R, et al. Medical sieve: a cognitive assistant for radiologists and cardiologists. In: Medical imaging 2016: computer- aided diagnosis, vol. 9785. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2016. 97850A.
63. Bungartz KD, Lalowski K, Elkin SK. Making the right calls in precision oncology. Nat Biotechnol 2018;36(8):692–6.
64. Somashekhar S, Kumarc R, Rauthan A, Arun K, Patil P, Ramya Y. Abstract s6-07: double blinded validation study to assess performance of ibm artificial intelligence platform, watson for oncology in comparison with manipal multidisciplinary tumour board–first study of 638 breast cancer cases. 2017.
65. Varshney RK, Shi C, Thudi M, Mariac C, Wallace J, Qi P, Zhang H, Zhao Y, Wang X, Rathore A, et al. Pearl millet genome sequence provides a resource to improve agronomic traits in arid environments. Nat Biotechnol 2017;35(10): 969–76.
66. Steuer CE, Ramalingam SS. Tumor mutation burden: leading immunotherapy to the era of precision medicine. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(7):631–2.
67. Mbatha SZ, Mkhize-Kwitshana ZL, Mulaudzi TV, Hull R, Dlamini Z. Artificial Intelligence Application to Microbiomics Data for Improved Clinical Decision Making in Precision Oncology. InArtificial Intelligence and Precision Oncology: Bridging Cancer Research and Clinical Decision Support 2023 Jan 21 (pp. 157-177). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
68. Zhang J, Walsh MF, Wu G, Edmonson MN, Gruber TA, Easton J, Hedges D, Ma X, Zhou X, Yergeau DA, et al. Germline mutations in predisposition genes in pediatric cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;373(24):2336–46.
69. Mody RJ, Prensner JR, Everett J, Parsons DW, Chinnaiyan AM. Precision medicine in pediatric oncology: lessons learned and next steps. Pediatr Blood Canc 2017;64(3):e26288.
70. Rajan K, Saffiotti A. Towards a science of integrated AI and Robotics. Artif Intell 2017;247:1–9.
71. Murphy RR. Introduction to AI robotics. MIT press; 2019 Oct 1.
72. Li K, Burdick JW. Human motion analysis in medical robotics via high- dimensional inverse reinforcement learning. Int J Robot Res 2020;39(5):568–85.
73. Patil S, Shankar H. Transforming healthcare: harnessing the power of AI in the modern era. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Arts. 2023 Jul 10;2(1):60-70.
74. Collins FS. Exceptional opportunities in medical science: a view from the National Institutes of Health. Jama. 2015 Jan 13;313(2):131-2.
75. Fisher AJ, Medaglia JD, Jeronimus BF. Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. Proc Natl Acad Sci Unit States Am 2018;115(27):E6106–15.
76. Zhou N, Zhang C-T, Lv H-Y, Hao C-X, Li T-J, Zhu J-J, Zhu H, Jiang M, Liu K-W, Hou H-L, et al. Concordance study between ibm watson for oncology and clinical practice for patients with cancer in China. Oncol 2019;24(6):812.
77. D. Wang, A. Khosla, R. Gargeya, H. Irshad, A. H. Beck, Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer, arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05718.
78. Khera AV, Chaffin M, Aragam KG, Haas ME, Roselli C, Choi SH, Natarajan P, Lander ES, Lubitz SA, Ellinor PT, et al. Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations. Nat Genet 2018;50(9):1219–24.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC Attribution 4.0
