The Integral Role of Nursing Informatics in Enhancing Patient Outcomes through the Integration of Health Information Systems in Clinical Practice: Review
Keywords:
Nursing Informatics, Electronic Nursing Records, Health Information Systems, Patient Outcomes, Standardized Terminology.Abstract
Abstract
Background: The evolution of nursing from a practice-oriented to a science-based discipline necessitates the integration of health information systems, particularly electronic nursing records, to enhance patient outcomes and streamline clinical workflows. The World Health Organization has recognized the importance of emerging technologies in healthcare management, emphasizing standardized documentation practices in nursing.
Methods: This study employs a comprehensive literature review methodology to explore the role of nursing informatics in integrating health information systems into clinical practice. The analysis focuses on various nursing classification systems, the impact of electronic nursing records on documentation quality, and the correlation between digital records and patient care outcomes.
Results: The findings indicate that the implementation of electronic nursing records significantly improves the quality of nursing documentation, enhances patient safety, and facilitates evidence-based practice. Furthermore, the study reveals that standardized nursing terminologies, such as NANDA, NOC, and NIC, are essential for effective communication among healthcare providers and contribute to better patient care coordination. However, challenges such as insufficient training and varying levels of technology adoption across countries persist.
Conclusion: The integration of health information systems in nursing practice is crucial for optimizing patient care and improving health outcomes. Continued efforts to standardize nursing documentation and enhance digital literacy among healthcare professionals are necessary to fully harness the potential of electronic nursing records. Future research should focus on the long-term impacts of electronic nursing records on nursing practice and patient outcomes across diverse clinical settings.
References
References
1. Mateos-Garcia M.D. Implementación y evaluación de la documentación enfermera en la historia digital: Experiencia en el hospital Virgen de Valme; Proceedings of the X Simposium AENTDE “Lenguaje Enfermero: Identidad, Utilidad y Calidad”; Sevilla, Spain. 3–4 April 2014.
2. Rita-Vizoso R. Ph.D. Thesis. Universidad de A Coruña; A Coruña, Spain: 2017. Cambios en la Practica Asistencial Tras la Adopción del Modelo de Virginia Henderson.
3. Rubio Sevilla J.C., Arribas Espada J.L. Manual Básico del Programa Gacela. Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo. Direccion de Enfermeria. [(accessed on 15 September 2024)].
4. Sanchez Ros N., Regiosa Gago L.F. Selene. Informatizacion de la historia clínica electrónica: Implicación sobre el proceso de enfermeria. Enferm. Glob. 2006;5:8.
5. Sousa E.C.V., Lopes V.O.M., Fereira L.G., Diniz M.C., Froes B.M.N., Sobreira A.B. The construction and evaluation of new educational software for nursing diagnoses: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Educ. Today. 2016;36:221–229.
6. Fennely O., Grogan L., Reed A., Hardiker N.R. Use of standardized terminologies in clinical practice: A scoping review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2021;149:104431.
7. Atanasova V. Electronic Nursing Record. Manag. Educ. 2012;8:190–196.
8. Grove S.K., Gray J.R. Investigacion en Enfermeria: Desarrollo de la Practica Enfermera Basada en la Evidencia. 7th ed. Elsevier; Barcelona, Spain: 2008. pp. 6–11.
9. Halloran E.J. Virginia Henderson and her timeless writings. J. Adv. Nurs. 1996;23:17–24.
10. Parra M.L., Ruiz S.S., Rueda G.S., Porras M.D.B., Donaire L.F., Yarnoz A.Z., Sabater D.A., Peláez S.V., Sábado J.T. Los modelos en la practica asistencial: Visión de los profesionales y estudiantes de enfermeria. Metas Enferm. 2009;4:16–26.
11. Arksey H., O’Malley L. Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.
12. Peters M.D.J., Godfrey C.M., Khalil H., McInerney P., Parker D., Soares C.B. Guidance for Conducting Systematic Scoping Reviews. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2015;13:141–146.
13. Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffman T.C., Mulrow C.D., Shamseer L., Tetzlaff J.M., Akl E.A., Brennan S.E., et al. Declaración PRISMA 2020: Una Guía Actualizada Para La Publicación de revisiones Sistemáticas. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2021;74:790–799.
14. Ngusie H.S., Kassie S.Y., Zemariam A.B., Walle A.D., Enyew E.B., Kasaye M.D., Seboka B.T., Mengiste S.A. Understanding the predictors of health professionals’ intention to use electronic health record system: Extend and apply UTAUT3 model. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2024;24:889.
15. Zhang S., Quan Y.Y., Chen J. Construction and application of an ICU nursing electronic medical record quality control system in a Chinese tertiary hospital: A prospective controlled trial. BMC Nurs. 2024;23:493.
16. Hannah K.J., White P.A., Nagle L.M., Pringle D.M. Standardizing nursing information in Canada for inclusion in electronic health records: C-HOBIC. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2009;16:524–530.
17. Heidarizadeh K., Rassouli M., Manoochehri H., Tafreshi M.Z., Ghorbanpour R.K. Effect of electronic report writing on the quality of nursing report recording. Electron. Physician. 2017;9:5439–5445.
18. Ahn M., Choi M., Kim Y. Factors Associated with the Timeliness of Electronic Nursing Documentation. Healthc. Inform. Res. 2016;22:270–276.
19. Stevenson J.E., Nilsson G.C., Petersson G.I., Johansson P.E. Nurses’ experience of using electronic patient records in everyday practice in acute/inpatient ward settings: A literature review. Health Inform. J. 2010;16:63–72.
20. Lima A.F., de Oliveira Melo T. Percepção de enfermeiros em relação à implementação da informatização da documentação clínica de enfermagem [Nurses’ perception regarding the implementation of computer-based clinical nursing documentation] Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. 2012;46:175–183.
21. Meum T., Wangensteen G., Soleng K.S., Wynn R. How does nursing staff perceive the use of electronic handover reports? A questionnaire-based study. Int. J. Telemed. Appl. 2011;2011:505426.
22. Hyun S., Johnson S.B., Stetson P.D., Bakken S. Development and evaluation of nursing user interface screens using multiple methods. J. Biomed. Inform. 2009;42:1004–1012.
23. Min Y.H., Park H.A., Chung E., Lee H. Implementation of a next-generation electronic nursing records system based on detailed clinical models and integration of clinical practice guidelines. Healthc. Inform. Res. 2013;19:301–306.
24. Rouleau G., Gagnon M., Côté J., Payne-Gagnon J., Hudson E., Dubois C. Impact of information and communication technologies on nursing care: Results of an overview of systematic reviews. J. Med. Internet Res. 2017;19:e122.
25. Laukvik L.B., Lyngstad M., Rotegård A.K., Fossum M. Utilizing nursing standards in electronic health records: A descriptive qualitative study. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2024;184:105350.
26. Goossen W.T., Ozbolt J.G., Coenen A., Park H.A., Mead C., Ehnfors M., Marin H.F. Development of a provisional domain model for the nursing process for use within the Health Level 7 reference information model. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004;11:186–194.
27. Sasso G., Barra D., Paese F., Almeida S., Rios G., Marinho M., Debétio M. Computerized nursing process: Methodology to establish associations between clinical assessment, diagnosis, interventions, and outcomes. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. 2013;47:242–249.
28. Parvan K., Hosseini F.A., Jasemi M., Thomson B. Attitude of nursing students following the implementation of comprehensive computer-based nursing process in medical surgical internship: A quasi-experimental study. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2021;21:10.
29. Westra B.L., Delaney C.W., Konicek D., Keenan G. Nursing standards to support the electronic health record. Nurs. Outlook. 2008;56:258–266.
30. Westra B.L., Latimer G.E., Matney S.A., Park J.I., Sensmeier J., Simpson R.L., Swanson M.J., Warren J.J., Delaney C.W. A national action plan for sharable and comparable nursing data to support practice and translational research for transforming health care. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2015;22:600–607.
31. Müller-Staub M. Preparing nurses to use standardized nursing language in the electronic health record. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2009;146:337–341.
32. Chang H.M., Huang E.W., Hou I.C., Liu H.Y., Li F.S., Chiou S.F. Using a text mining approach to explore the recording quality of a nursing record system. J. Nurs. Res. 2019;27:e27.
33. Jayousi S., Barchielli C., Alaimo M., Caputo S., Paffetti M., Zoppi P., Mucchi L. ICT in nursing and patient healthcare management: Scoping review and case studies. Sensors. 2024;24:3129.
34. Luan Z., Zhang Z., Gao Y., Du S., Wu N., Chen Y., Peng X. Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis. Front. Public Health. 2023;11:1049411.
35. Dionisi S., Di Simone E., Alicastro G.M., Angelini S., Giannetta N., Iacorossi L., Di Muzio M. Nursing Summary: Designing a nursing section in the Electronic Health Record. Acta Biomed. 2019;90:293–299.
36. Irwin P., Hanson M., McDonald S., Noble D., Mollart L. Nursing students’ perspectives on being work-ready with electronic medical records: Intersections of rurality and health workforce capacity. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2024;77:103948.
37. Naamneh R., Bodas M. The effect of electronic medical records on medication errors, workload, and medical information availability among qualified nurses in Israel—A cross sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2024;23:270.
38. Topaz M., Ronquillo C., Peltonen L.M., Pruinelli L., Sarmiento R.F., Badger M.K., Ali S., Lewis A., Georgsson M., Jeon E., et al. Nurse informaticians report low satisfaction and multi-level concerns with electronic health records: Results from an international survey. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2017;2016:2016–2025.
39. Wynn M., Garwood-Cross L., Vasilica C., Griffiths M., Heaslip V., Phillips N. Digitizing nursing: A theoretical and holistic exploration to understand the adoption and use of digital technologies by nurses. J. Adv. Nurs. 2023;79:3737–3747.
40. Alrasheeday A.M., Alshammari B., Alkubati S.A., Pasay-an E., Albloushi M., Alshammari A.M. Nurses’ attitudes and factors affecting use of electronic health record in Saudi Arabia. Healthcare. 2023;11:2393.
41. Kaihlanen A.M., Elovainio M., Virtanen L., Kinnunen U.M., Vehko T., Saranto K., Heponiemi T. Nursing informatics competence profiles and perceptions of health information system usefulness among registered nurses: A latent profile analysis. J. Adv. Nurs. 2023;79:4022–4033.
42. Lloyd S., Long K., Probst Y., Di Donato J., Alvandi A.O., Roach J., Bain C. Medical and nursing clinician perspectives on the usability of the hospital electronic medical record: A qualitative analysis. Health Inf. Manag. 2023;53:189–197.
43. Al-Aubaidy H.F.K., Abdulwahhab M.M. Assessment of nurses’ knowledge toward electronic nursing documentation. Rawal Med. J. 2023;48:88–91.
44. Strudwick G., Jeffs L., Kemp J., Sequeira L., Lo B., Shen N., Paterson P., Coombe N., Yang L., Ronald K., et al. Identifying and adapting interventions to reduce documentation burden and improve nurses’ efficiency in using electronic health record systems (The IDEA Study): Protocol for a mixed methods study. BMC Nurs. 2022;21:213.
45. Drnovšek R., Milavec Kapun M., Rajkovič V., Rajkovič U. Analysis of two diverse nursing records applications: Mixed methods approach. Zdr. Varst. 2022;61:137–144.
46. Poissant L., Pereira J., Tamblyn R., Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: A systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005;12:505–516.
47. Kleib M., Jackman D., Duarte Wisnesky U., Ali S. Academic electronic health records in undergraduate nursing education: Mixed methods pilot study. JMIR Nurs. 2021;4:e26944.
48. Bjarnadottir R.I., Herzig C.T.A., Travers J.L., Castle N.G., Stone P.W. Implementation of electronic health records in US nursing homes. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2017;35:417–424.
49. Shafiee M., Shanbehzadeh M., Nassari Z., Kazemi-Arpanahi H. Development and evaluation of an electronic nursing documentation system. BMC Nurs. 2022;21:15.
50. Inclusion of Recognized Terminologies Supporting Nursing Practice Within Electronic Health Records and Other Health Information Technology Solutions. [(accessed on 15 September 2024)]. Available online: https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursing-excellence/official-position-statements/id/Inclusion-of-Recognized-Terminologies-Supporting-Nursing-Practice-within-Electronic-Health-Records/
51. Zaman N., Goldberg D.M., Kelly S., Russell R.S., Drye S.L. The relationship between nurses’ training and perceptions of electronic documentation systems. Nurs. Rep. 2021;11:12–27
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ibrahim Ahmed Jaber Alnaji , Amal Sulaiman Muteb Alkhaldi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC Attribution 4.0
