Interdependence of Laboratory Turnaround Time, Nursing Workflow, and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare Delivery

Authors

  • Mohammed Hazzaa Hufayr Alanazi Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • SAYER HAMDAN SALEM ALSHARARI Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qurayyat General Hospital Al-Jouf Health Cluster
  • TARIQ MAQBUL AWADH ALSHARARI Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qurayyat General Hospital Al-Jouf Health Cluster
  • YOUSEF DHAIFALLAH DABI ALSHARARI Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qurayyat General Hospital Al-Jouf Health Cluster
  • Yahya Ahmed Alzahrani Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Security forces hospital Dammam 
  • FATIMAH AHMAD ALI DHAMASHY Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Abu Arish General Hospital
  • Esam Rizgallah Omar Megdad Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Arada Mental Health Hospital  Jazan Health Cluster
  • Ashwaq ali musa almoalwy Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, King salman hospital Riyadh
  • ARWA MUBARK F ALDAWSARI Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Al Imam Abdulrahman Al Faisal Hospital
  • Hanan thuwaini   aldhafeeri Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, King Khalid Hospital hafer albatin 

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64483/jmph-75

Keywords:

Laboratory Turnaround Time, Nursing Workflows, Patient Satisfaction, Point-of-Care Testing, Electronic Health Records.

Abstract

Background: Laboratory turnaround time (TAT), defined as the time between collection of the sample and making the results available for the clinician, is a key indicator in healthcare. TATs can affect nursing workflows and patient satisfaction. Delayed TAT can increase nurse workload, disrupt care delivery, and decrease patient trust, while short turnaround time promotes efficiency, satisfaction, and patient outcomes. Aim: To assess the impact of TAT on nursing care delivery and patient satisfaction, identify potential steps for optimizing TAT, and address the barriers to changing TAT. Methods: This review comprised a synthesis of peer-reviewed literature examining the effect of TAT on nursing workflow, patient satisfaction, and interventions, including point-of-care testing (POCT) and electronic health record (EHR) integration, based on clinical, operational, and patient-focused outcomes. Results: Long laboratory turnaround time can worsen nurse workload, increase stress, and raise error rates, with the worst impact occurring in high acuity settings. Similarly, shorter TAT had an improved workflow by allowing for POCT to remove redundant activities. Long TAT can negatively lower patient satisfaction due to the added anxiety of waiting, while the less time a patient waits, the better. Optimizing TAT improves care delivery and trust with patients. Interventions such as POCT and EHR integration can reduce TAT by about 20-50%. Barriers to optimized TAT can include costs associated with creating an intervention and staffing shortages. Professional collaboration and creating standardized TAT protocols may help to eliminate delays. Conclusion: Improving TAT can improve healthcare efficiency and improve patient satisfaction. Implementation of POCT, electronic health record interface, and standardized protocols will be crucial, and support with education and investigation on cost-effective solutions.

References

Alelign, A., & Belay, Y. A. (2019). Patient satisfaction with clinical laboratory services and associated factors among adult patients attending outpatient departments at Debre Markos referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC research notes, 12(1), 517. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4558-8

Anderson, E. S., Gray, R., & Price, K. (2017). Patient safety and interprofessional education: A report of key issues from two interprofessional workshops. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(2), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2016.1261816

Apostu, S. A., Vasile, V., & Veres, C. (2021). Externalities of lean implementation in medical laboratories. Process optimization vs. adaptation and flexibility for the future. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12309. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312309

Ballin, M., Ioannidis, J. P., Bergman, J., Kivipelto, M., Nordström, A., & Nordström, P. (2022). Time-varying risk of death after SARS-CoV-2 infection in Swedish long-term care facility residents: a matched cohort study. BMJ open, 12(11), e066258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066258

Bøtker, M. T., Jacobsen, L., Rudolph, S. S., & Knudsen, L. (2018). The role of point of care ultrasound in prehospital critical care: a systematic review. Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 26(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0518-x

Brenner, S. K., Kaushal, R., Grinspan, Z., Joyce, C., Kim, I., Allard, R. J., ... & Abramson, E. L. (2016). Effects of health information technology on patient outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(5), 1016-1036. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv138

Brown, K. M., Jones, M. B., Moore, L., Meliones, C., Montgomery, J. A., & Ascenzi, J. (2019). Advanced Nursing Practice in Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care. In Critical Heart Disease in Infants and Children (pp. 82-93). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-0760-7.00010-3

Byrum, D. (2021). Improving Emergency department Length of Stay by Reducing Laboratory Turnaround Times (Doctoral dissertation, East Carolina University).

Carson, J. (2022). Systematic Review How Point-of-Care Testing is Currently Implemented in Healthcare in Compliance with Regulatory and Implementation Standards (Master's thesis, University of California, Davis).

Colvin, R. B., Chang, A., & Cornell, L. D. (2023). Diagnostic Pathology: Kidney Diseases E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.

da Cruz, J. R. M., & da Silva Martins, M. D. (2019). Pneumonia associated with invasive mechanical ventilation: nursing care. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 4(20), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.12707/RIV18035

Fan, G., & Wang, Q. (2021). Quality control and quality assurance. In Clinical molecular diagnostics (pp. 97-113). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1037-0_8

Fernandes, L., Santos, D., Santos, M., & Rocha, N. P. (2022). How to improve emergency information systems to optimize the care of acute stroke. Procedia Computer Science, 196, 606-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.055

Gamble, B., Dubrowski, A., Torres, A., & Short, M. (2023, January). Virtual interprofessional education to support medical laboratory technologists' participation in interprofessional collaborative practice within integrated healthcare models. In Healthcare Management Forum (Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 21-25). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704221114961

Garcia, L. S., Arrowood, M., Kokoskin, E., Paltridge, G. P., Pillai, D. R., Procop, G. W., ... & Visvesvara, G. (2018). Practical guidance for clinical microbiology laboratories: laboratory diagnosis of parasites from the gastrointestinal tract. Clinical microbiology reviews, 31(1), 10-1128. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00025-17

Green, D. A., Weidmann, M. D., & Srivastava-Malick, M. S. (2022). Diagnostic stewardship: the central role of clinical microbiology laboratories. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter, 44(20), 179-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2022.10.004

Goel, V., Mathew, S., Gudi, N., Jacob, A., & John, O. (2023). A scoping review on laboratory surveillance in the WHO Southeast Asia Region: Past, present and the future. Journal of Global Health, 13, 04028. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04028

Gohar, B., & Nowrouzi-Kia, B. (2022). The forgotten (invisible) healthcare heroes: experiences of Canadian medical laboratory employees working during the pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 854507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.854507

Hennein, R., Goddard, E., & Sherman, J. D. (2022). Stakeholder perspectives on scaling up medical device reprocessing: A qualitative study. Plos one, 17(12), e0279808. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279808

Hill, M. A., Coppinger, T., Sedig, K., Gallagher, W. J., Baker, K. M., Haskell, H., ... & Smith, K. M. (2023). “What Else Could It Be?” A Scoping Review of Questions for Patients to Ask Throughout the Diagnostic Process. Journal of patient safety, 10-1097. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001273

Khatab, Z., & Yousef, G. M. (2021). Disruptive innovations in the clinical laboratory: catching the wave of precision diagnostics. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences, 58(8), 546-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2021.1943302

Kundu, S., Tabassum, S., & Kumar, R. (2021). Plasmonic point-of-care device for sepsis biomarker detection. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(17), 18837-18846. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3088117

Lo, J., Fayyaz, Y., Jaswal, S., Gohar, B., Yazdani, A., Chattu, V. K., & Nowrouzi-Kia, B. (2022). Factors associated with job satisfaction in medical laboratory professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study in Ontario, Canada. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(1), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13010004

Malla, A. M., & Amin, U. (2023). Scope of technology in health care, special focus on nursing. Journal of Integrative Nursing, 5(4), 300-310. DOI: 10.4103/jin.jin_92_23

Marcus, M. E., Ebert, C., Geldsetzer, P., Theilmann, M., Bicaba, B. W., Andall-Brereton, G., ... & Vollmer, S. (2021). Unmet need for hypercholesterolemia care in 35 low-and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative surveys. PLoS medicine, 18(10), e1003841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003841

Morias, C., Palmer, G., & Santhakumar, A. (2018). Pre-analytical errors and patient outcomes in the total testing process. Australian Journal of Medical Science, 39(1/2), 14-27. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.535368235007189

Ombelet, S., Kpossou, G., Kotchare, C., Agbobli, E., Sogbo, F., Massou, F., ... & Jacobs, J. (2022). Blood culture surveillance in a secondary care hospital in Benin: epidemiology of bloodstream infection pathogens and antimicrobial resistance. BMC infectious diseases, 22(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07077-z

Paul, I. I., Victoria, M., & Olalere, O. S. (2023). Patient turnaround time: Concern of medical laboratory scientist. Sokoto Journal of Medical Laboratory Science, 8(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sokjmls.v8i1.12.

Ørvim Sølvik, U., Risøy, A. J., Kjome, R. L., & Sandberg, S. (2018). Quality control of Norwegian pharmacy HbA1c testing: a modest beginning. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 12(4), 753-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296818766378

Ridho, F., Hartono, S., & Istiqomah, I. (2021). Easy, quality of service, and timeliness of delivery to customer satisfaction. Almana: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 5(2), 184-191. https://doi.org/10.36555/almana.v5i2.1552

Schumacher, L. D., Jäger, L., Meier, R., Rachamin, Y., Senn, O., Rosemann, T., & Markun, S. (2020). Trends and between-physician variation in laboratory testing: a retrospective longitudinal study in general practice. Journal of clinical medicine, 9(6), 1787. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061787

Smith, T. L. (2020). Reducing Blood Culture Contamination Rates by Utilizing a Blood Collection Procedural Checklist (Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University).

Thakur, V., Akerele, O. A., & Randell, E. (2023). Lean and Six Sigma as continuous quality improvement frameworks in the clinical diagnostic laboratory. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, 60(1), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2022.2106544

Umar, A., Ameh, C. A., Muriithi, F., & Mathai, M. (2019). Early warning systems in obstetrics: A systematic literature review. PloS one, 14(5), e0217864. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217864

Vázquez, M., Anfossi, L., Ben-Yoav, H., Diéguez, L., Karopka, T., Della Ventura, B., ... & Franco-Martínez, L. (2021). Use of some cost-effective technologies for a routine clinical pathology laboratory. Lab on a Chip, 21(22), 4330-4351. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1LC00658D

White, T. E., Wong, W. B., Janowiak, D., & Hilborne, L. H. (2021). Strategies for laboratory professionals to drive laboratory stewardship. Practical Laboratory Medicine, 26, e00249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00249

Wilson, G. M., Walker, P. H., & Ball, M. J. (2022). Emerging Need for a New Vision of Multi-Interprofessional Training in Health Informatics. In Healthcare Information Management Systems: Cases, Strategies, and Solutions (pp. 363-374). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07912-2_24

Wilson, C. D., Mand, D., Ring, D., & Ramtin, S. (2023). A systematic review of satisfaction measures in hand and wrist surgery. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 48(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.10.012

Downloads

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

Alanazi, M. H. H., ALSHARARI, S. H. S., ALSHARARI, T. M. A., ALSHARARI, Y. D. D., Alzahrani, Y. A., DHAMASHY, F. A. A., … aldhafeeri,H.thuwaini . (2024). Interdependence of Laboratory Turnaround Time, Nursing Workflow, and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare Delivery. Saudi Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 1(1), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.64483/jmph-75

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)