Perception and Clinical Assessment of Fetal Movement in Nursing Practice: Implications for Maternal–Fetal Surveillance and Perinatal Outcomes
Abstract
Background: Fetal movement is a critical indicator of fetal wellbeing and neurological integrity. Its perception by pregnant individuals serves as an accessible, patient-centered marker for maternal–fetal surveillance. Nursing practice emphasizes awareness and structured monitoring, such as kick counts, to detect deviations that may signal hypoxemia or placental insufficiency.
Aim: To explore the clinical significance of fetal movement perception, its role in nursing care, and implications for maternal–fetal outcomes.
Methods: This review synthesizes current evidence and guidelines on fetal movement monitoring, including physiologic basis, timing of quickening, influencing factors, and structured assessment strategies. It also examines nursing interventions and interprofessional approaches for managing decreased fetal movement.
Results: Maternal perception of fetal movement reflects neuromuscular maturation and offers early warning of potential compromise. Structured monitoring, such as count-to-10 kick counts, enhances detection of abnormal patterns. Reports of decreased movement correlate with increased risk of adverse outcomes, including stillbirth. Prompt evaluation using nonstress tests (NST) and biophysical profiles (BPP) is essential. Nursing roles encompass triage, patient education, and coordination of care, ensuring timely escalation and reducing delays in intervention.
Conclusion: Fetal movement monitoring remains a low-cost, effective strategy for early identification of fetal compromise. Nursing professionals play a pivotal role in education, surveillance, and interprofessional coordination, optimizing perinatal outcomes through timely response and patient-centered care.
Full text article
References
Qin M, Xu Y, Liang Y, Sun T. A wearable fetal movement detection system for pregnant women. Frontiers in medicine. 2023:10():1160373. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1160373.
Das R, Jana N, Arora N, Sengupta S. Ultrasound assessment of fetal hearing response to vibroacoustic stimulation. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2020 Jul:33(14):2326-2332. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1548600.
Kapaya H, Almeida J, Karouni F, Anumba D. Management of reduced fetal movement: A comparative analysis of two audits at a tertiary care clinical service. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2020 May:248():128-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.040.
National Guideline Alliance (UK). Fetal movement monitoring: Antenatal care: Evidence review P. 2021 Aug
Einspieler C,Prayer D,Marschik PB, Fetal movements: the origin of human behaviour. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2021 Oct
Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. Decreased Fetal Movement: AWHONN Practice Brief #20. Nursing for women's health. 2024 Feb:28(1):e1-e3. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2023.11.004.
Tsakiridis I, Zerva C, Mamopoulos A, Kalogiannidis I, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Maternal perception of fetal movements: onset and associated factors. Journal of perinatal medicine. 2022 Nov 25:50(9):1174-1179. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0606.
Flenady V, Ellwood D, Bradford B, Coory M, Middleton P, Gardener G, Radestad I, Homer C, Davies-Tuck M, Forster D, Gordon A, Groom K, Crowther C, Walker S, Foord C, Warland J, Murphy M, Said J, Boyle F, O'Donoghue K, Cronin R, Sexton J, Weller M, McCowan L. Beyond the headlines: Fetal movement awareness is an important stillbirth prevention strategy. Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives. 2019 Feb:32(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.12.001.
Hayes DJL, Dumville JC, Walsh T, Higgins LE, Fisher M, Akselsson A, Whitworth M, Heazell AEP. Effect of encouraging awareness of reduced fetal movement and subsequent clinical management on pregnancy outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM. 2023 Mar:5(3):100821. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100821.
Warrander LK,Batra G,Bernatavicius G,Greenwood SL,Dutton P,Jones RL,Sibley CP,Heazell AE, Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements is associated with altered placental structure and function. PloS one. 2012;
Frøen JF. A kick from within--fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care. Journal of perinatal medicine. 2004:32(1):13
Bellussi F, Po' G, Livi A, Saccone G, De Vivo V, Oliver EA, Berghella V. Fetal Movement Counting and Perinatal Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020 Feb:135(2):453-462. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003645.
Miller DA, Rabello YA, Paul RH. The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1996 Mar:174(3):812-7
Haws RA, Yakoob MY, Soomro T, Menezes EV, Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA. Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2009 May 7:9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-S1-S5.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Radiyh Abdullah Almarzooq, Nuha Fahad Mutlaq Almutlaq, Entesar Mohammed M Alsaadi, Hajar Lafi Alian Almutiri, Doaa Salim Hamid Alabsi, Hadeel Saleh Aljohani, Ghandar ahamidaimawlid, Samahzid Alshuraymi , Layla Hussein Eissa Al Habbabi, Salma Mohammed Ali Almohanna, Bayan Ebraheem Ali Alkhalifah, Hayat Saleh Alkhlaifi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.